Rangers have spent fortunes... but badlypublished at 11:04 BST 21 August
Tom English
BBC Scotland's chief sports writer
Image source, SNSWhat must Andrew Cavenagh in America be making of all this?
Eleven new signings in recent weeks at Rangers and close to 30 since his consortium moved in last summer.
Their running total of transfer fees long since careered past the £25m mark. Last January, it sped across the £35m barrier and now it's knocking on the door of £50-£60m on new players.
These players. These largely dull, pedestrian Rangers men playing in front of a mostly hushed and increasingly tired stadium with 15,000 empty seats.
They won on the night, and so hope lives for some of kind of European story this season, but it was so desperately lacking.
Within the club there is patience and a mindset that this is a long road Rangers are on and an acceptance they're only at the start of it.
There is a commitment to spend and spend again. Cavenagh and his backers have been true to their word, they have stumped up fortunes. Have they spent well? Right now, it's impossible to say that they have.
Compare this to Celtic's elan and fluidity the night before. Compare the sustained class of Camilo Duran to anything that Rangers have. Duran cost somewhere between five and six million.
Where is Rangers' Duran? Where is their Callum McGregor, their Benjamin Nygren, their Kieran Tierney, their standard-setters, their goal machines, their players who drive the team forward?
Where, indeed, is their Nico Raskin? On the bench on the night. Unused. A wee injury, apparently. Nothing to do with the rumoured gathering interest from Fenerbahce, we were told.

























