Shankland to drop out? Your questions answeredpublished at 16:52 BST 19 June
Image source, PA MediaOne game down. At least two to go. And so many questions.
As Scotland get set to face Morocco, we put your questions to Leanne Crichton on the BBC Scottish Football YouTube channel.
Would you go with the same team as started against Haiti in the game with Morocco?
There won't be wholesale changes. There never is regards to Steve Clarke and his teams. The two strikers against Haiti [Lawrence Shankland and Che Adams] was the one thing we all wanted.
There was probably real pros and cons to it and a lot of the cons, in my opinion, were down to just our ability on the ball. I don't necessarily think it was a system problem.
Morocco and Brazil were always going to be different games, so I don't envisage the same shape. I would be really surprised if it was the same line-up, I definitely think one of the strikers will miss out.
Do you think Steve Clarke will drop Lawrence Shankland and play Che Adams as a lone striker to get a point against Morocco?
I'm unsure as to who Steve will look to, I don't think it'll be Shankland. It's about managing expectations between games one and two and probably knowing how much time you spend without the ball.
For Lawrence, it will be a case of if we're still in the game he can be an impact sub, I could be wrong, but probably just looking as I'm saying, maybe it points to us being a bit more direct.
I still think Adams is really good at what he does, in addition to his energy. His movement the other night was really good in terms of freeing up Shankland and stretching the game.
Is Billy Gilmour a bigger miss than we imagined?
Gilmour was always going to be a miss. For me it's huge, if you're a goalkeeper or a defender, you need someone like Gilmour looking at you, that willingness and that trust, taking the ball anywhere, that's what Gilmour does and he does it really well.
He plays off the one and two touch really nicely and knows how to attract pressure. In the Haiti game beyond probably 25 minutes, I think they reacted to how we were building the game and made it much more difficult with the ball.
Can we live without Gilmour? Absolutely. You look at some point at Tyler Fletcher, because the reason he's been brought here is because in the small glimpses that we've seen and the quality that he has, he's deemed to be good enough to get in there and play and replace Billy Gilmour.
If you've overlooked the likes of Lennon Miller, you've not gone back to players that are tried and tested, so could that be the golden nugget that we see again in terms of using the ball?






















